Interpreting Reactive Species Interdependencies in Plasma-Activated Saline: An Exploratory Multivariate Workflow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v7i2.417Keywords:
Plasma-Activated Saline, Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species, Multiple Linear Regression, Multicollinearity, Oxidation-Reduction PotentialAbstract
Interpreting complex chemical systems with highly correlated predictor variables poses a significant analytical challenge. Plasma-Activated Saline (PAS) exemplifies such a system, where interdependencies among reactive species can mask their individual effects on physicochemical properties such as the Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP). This study presents an exploratory workflow to investigate these relationships using a small dataset (n = 10) characterizing PAS generated by a serial DBD-GAPJ reactor. A computational routine combining Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) and Multiple Linear Regression modeled ORP as a function of O3, H2O2, HClO, NO3-, and NO2-. While EDA indicated H2O2 as the species most correlated with ORP, the regression model (R² = 0.84, adjusted R² = 0.65) revealed strong multicollinearity between O3 and HClO (r = +0.82; VIF > 6), complicating coefficient interpretation. Leave-one-out cross-validation yielded a negative predictive R² (Q² = -0.33), indicating limited out-of-sample predictive capability given the small sample size. When coefficients were standardized to account for differing concentration ranges, H2O2 showed the largest relative influence on ORP, followed by HClO and O3, although none of the predictors reached conventional statistical significance (p > 0.10). Considered alongside the standard reduction potentials (E°) of the species, these results suggest that H2O2, O3, and HClO are plausible, interdependent contributors to ORP, rather than supporting a single dominant driver. This work illustrates both the value and the limitations of multivariate modeling applied to small, collinear chemical datasets, highlighting standardization, cross-validation, and multicollinearity diagnostics as essential steps for robust chemometric interpretation
Downloads
References
[1] E. Tsoukou, P. Bourke, and D. Boehm, “Efficacy of plasma activated saline in a co-culture infection control model,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 20230, Nov. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20165-z.
[2] S. Kim and C.-H. Kim, “Applications of Plasma-Activated Liquid in the Medical Field,” Biomedicines, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 1700, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111700.
[3] Y. Jiang et al., “Cold atmospheric plasma-activated saline alleviates secondary injury post-SCI by inhibiting extracellular matrix remodeling and infiltration of proinflammatory macrophages,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 383, p. 115004, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.115004.
[4] M. Ghasemi, H. Najafzadehvarzi, S. Hassani, and A. Ershadian, “Therapeutic potential of nebulized plasma activated saline (N-PAS) in treating pulmonary infections in rats,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 206, p. 107699, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107699.
[5] V. Veronico et al., “Anticancer Effects of Plasma-Treated Water Solutions from Clinically Approved Infusion Liquids Supplemented with Organic Molecules,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 37, pp. 33723–33736, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c04061.
[6] V. Jirásek and P. Lukeš, “Formation of reactive chlorine species in saline solution treated by non-equilibrium atmospheric pressure He/O2 plasma jet,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ab0930.
[7] A. Mai-Prochnow et al., “Interactions of plasma-activated water with biofilms: inactivation, dispersal effects and mechanisms of action,” NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-020-00180-6.
[8] A. C. Borges et al., “Applications of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma in Dentistry,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1975, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11051975.
[9] T. F. de Melo et al., “Plasma–Saline Water Interaction: A Systematic Review,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 4854, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144854.
[10] S. Xu et al., “Anticancer effects of DBD plasma-activated saline within different discharge modes,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., vol. 56, no. 34, p. 345205, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/acd0bb.
[11] N. F. Azevedo Neto et al., “Serial association of dielectric barrier discharge and gliding arc systems: a novel approach for plasma-activated saline production,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., vol. 58, no. 1, p. 015202, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad800e.
[12] N. F Azevedo Neto, F. S. Miranda, P. W. P Moreira Junior, and R. S. Pessoa, “Influence of gas composition on reactive species generation in plasma-activated saline using two-stage plasma reactors system,” Phys. Scr., vol. 100, no. 7, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/adebb9.
[13] K. Sahoo, A. K. Samal, J. Pramanik, and S. K. Pani, “Exploratory data analysis using python,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4727–4735, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L3591.1081219.
[14] A. Bezerra, I. Silva, L. A. Guedes, D. Silva, G. Leitão, and K. Saito, “Extracting value from industrial alarms and events: A data-driven approach based on exploratory data analysis,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 19, no. 12, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122772.
[15] J. H. Kalivas, “Expanding the Chemometric Data Analysis Toolbox With Immersive Analytics,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1–5, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.70060.
[16] T. S. Madssen, A. Smilde, J. Camacho, A. H. Jarmund, J. Westerhuis, and G. F. Giskeødegård, “Statistical Validation of Multivariate Treatment Effects in Longitudinal Study Designs,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 39, no. 8, Aug. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.70044.
[17] P. C. Austin and E. W. Steyerberg, “The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses,” J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 627–636, Jun. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014.
[18] M. L. Waskom, “seaborn : statistical data visualization Statement of need,” vol. 6, pp. 1–4, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021.
[19] J. Hao and T. K. Ho, “Machine Learning Made Easy: A Review of Scikit-learn Package in Python Programming Language,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 348–361, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998619832248.
[20] F. Nelli, Python Data Analytics, 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3913-1.
[21] R. M. O’brien, “A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors,” Qual. Quant., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 673–690, Sep. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.
[22] P. Filzmoser, B. Liebmann, and K. Varmuza, “Repeated double cross validation,” J. Chemom., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 160–171, Apr. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1225.
[23] H. J. Kim et al., “Analyses of the Chemical Composition of Plasma-Activated Water and Its Potential Applications for Vaginal Health,” Biomedicines, vol. 11, no. 12, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123121.
[24] J. Ma et al., “Unusual Hypochlorous Acid (HClO) Recognition Mechanism Based on Chlorine–Oxygen Bond (Cl−O) Formation,” Chemistry – A European Journal, vol. 25, no. 29, pp. 7168–7176, May 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201806264.
[25] K. M. Yeater, S. E. Duke, and W. E. Riedell, “Multivariate Analysis: Greater Insights into Complex Systems,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 799–810, Mar. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0017.
[26] Z. C. Liu, L. Guo, D. X. Liu, M. Z. Rong, H. L. Chen, and M. G. Kong, “Chemical Kinetics and Reactive Species in Normal Saline Activated by a Surface Air Discharge,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 14, no. 4–5, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201600113.
[27] M. S. Siddiqui, “Chlorine-ozone interactions: Formation of chlorate,” Water Research, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2160–2170, Sep. 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(96)00071-1.
[28] A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems,” Technometrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–67, Feb. 1970, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.
[29] S. Wold, M. Sjöström, and L. Eriksson, “PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 109–130, Oct. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1.
[30] A. J. Bard, Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203738764.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nilton Francelosi Azevedo Neto, Orisson Ponce Gomes, Lucas Pereira Piedade, Felipe Souza Miranda, Rodrigo Savio Pessoa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and full publishing rights to their articles. Upon acceptance, authors grant Indonesian Journal of Data and Science a non-exclusive license to publish the work and to identify itself as the original publisher.
Self-archiving. Authors may deposit the submitted version, accepted manuscript, and version of record in institutional or subject repositories, with citation to the published article and a link to the version of record on the journal website.
Commercial permissions. Uses intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation are not permitted under CC BY-NC 4.0. For permissions, contact the editorial office at ijodas.journal@gmail.com.
Legacy notice. Some earlier PDFs may display “Copyright © [Journal Name]” or only a CC BY-NC logo without the full license text. To ensure clarity, the authors maintain copyright, and all articles are distributed under CC BY-NC 4.0. Where any discrepancy exists, this policy and the article landing-page license statement prevail.










