Comparison of ResNet50 and ResNet101 Feature Extraction for Tea Leaf Disease Classification Using Support Vector Machine

Authors

  • Wistiani Astuti Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Erick Irawadi Alwi Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Farniwati Fattah Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Tasrif Hasanuddin Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Julisa Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Ulfa Sari Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Ainur Rahma Almagfirah Universitas Muslim Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v7i2.338

Keywords:

Tea Leaf Disease, ResNet50, ResNet101, SVM, Deep Learning

Abstract

Tea leaf diseases negatively affect both crop quality and productivity, highlighting the importance of early and accurate diagnosis. This study evaluates ResNet50 and ResNet101 as pretrained feature extractors combined with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to determine whether a deeper residual architecture can better distinguish visually similar tea leaf disease classes. Images were obtained from the Kaggle “Identifying Disease in Tea Leaves” dataset, comprising eight categories: Anthracnose, algal leaf, bird eye spot, brown blight, gray light, healthy, red leaf spot, and white spot. Data augmentation increased each class to 800 images, producing 6,400 images that were divided into training and testing sets using an 80:20 ratio. Images were resized to 128 × 128 pixels for ResNet50 and 224 × 224 pixels for ResNet101. Feature vectors were generated by flattening convolutional feature maps from the ImageNet-pretrained networks without additional pooling. The extracted features were standardized and classified using an RBF-kernel SVM with C = 1.0 and gamma set to “scale.” ResNet101–SVM achieved 97.97% test accuracy, with precision, recall, and F1-score of 98%. In comparison, ResNet50–SVM obtained 89.15% accuracy, 90% precision, 89% recall, and 89% F1-score. These results indicate that ResNet101 captures finer texture and lesion-boundary information, enabling more reliable discrimination among similar disease classes. Therefore, deeper residual feature extraction provides a promising foundation for automated tea leaf disease diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] D. K. and M. F. F. Mintarsih, “Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Techniques on MobileNetV2 Performance in Tea Leaf Disease Classification,” in 12th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2024, pp. 1–5, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775557.

[2] N. IBRAHIM et al., “Klasifikasi Tingkat Kematangan Pucuk Daun Teh menggunakan Metode Convolutional Neural Network,” ELKOMIKA J. Tek. Energi Elektr. Tek. Telekomun. Tek. Elektron., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 162, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v10i1.162.

[3] N. Hardi, “Komparasi Algoritma MobileNet Dan Nasnet Mobile Pada Klasifikasi Penyakit Daun Teh,” Reputasi J. Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31294/reputasi.v3i1.1313.

[4] Mustikasari, A. R. Ramli, and A. K. Gibran, “Analisis Kinerja Algoritma Machine Learning Untuk Deteksi Penyakit Daun Teh Dengan Particle Swarm Optimization,” J. Embed. Syst. Secur. Intell. Syst., vol. 4, no. November, pp. 97–106, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.59562/jessi.v4i2.708.

[5] M. M. Azizah LN, Istiqomah IN, “Pemanfaatan teh sebagai hasil pertanian untuk pencegahan penyakit kronis pada masyarakat di wilayah Gunung Gambir Jember.,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Peduli Masyarakat, 2022, pp. 151–154.

[6] S. Salni, J. Juswardi, E. Junaidi, M. Kamal, and S. Triwardana, “Pelatihan Pembuatan Teh Herbal Dan Jamu Dari Daun Kardia (Bellucia Pentamera) Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Penyakit Degeneratif,” J. Altifani Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–121, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.59395/altifani.v4i2.527.

[7] D. Gaffar, A. W. M., Azmi, N., Alwi, E. I., Abdullah, S. M., Adawiyah, R., & Widyawati, “Optimizing Brain Tumor Classification with ResNet-50 Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Algorithms,” 2025, pp. 1–7, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM64595.2025.10857486.

[8] Faiz Nashrullah, Suryo Adhi Wibowo, and Gelar Budiman, “The Investigation of Epoch Parameters in ResNet-50 Architecture for Pornographic Classification,” J. Comput. Electron. Telecommun., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.52435/complete.v1i1.51.

[9] C. L. Lin and K. C. Wu, “Development of revised ResNet-50 for diabetic retinopathy detection,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05293-1.

[10] H. Darwis, R. Puspitasari, Purnawansyah, W. Astuti, D. Atmajaya, and M. Hasnawi, “A Deep Learning Approach for Improving Waste Classification Accuracy with ResNet50 Feature Extraction,” Proc. 2025 19th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Inf. Manag. Commun. IMCOM 2025, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM64595.2025.10857536.

[11] N. Hanun, M. Sarosa, and R. Andrie Asmara, “Pemanfaatan Algoritma Faster R-CNN ResNet-101 Untuk Deteksi Potongan Tubuh Manusia,” J. Elektron. dan Otomasi Ind., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 94–103, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33795/elkolind.v10i1.2754.

[12] G. W. Wicaksono and Andreawan, “ResNet101 Model Performance Enhancement in Classifying Rice Diseases with Leaf Images,” J. RESTI, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v7i2.4575.

[13] Ulfah Nur Oktaviana, Ricky Hendrawan, Alfian Dwi Khoirul Annas, and Galih Wasis Wicaksono, “Klasifikasi Penyakit Padi berdasarkan Citra Daun Menggunakan Model Terlatih Resnet101,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1216–1222, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v5i6.3607.

[14] S. Rabbani, D. Safitri, N. Rahmadhani, A. A. F. Sani, and M. K. Anam, “Perbandingan Evaluasi Kernel SVM untuk Klasifikasi Sentimen dalam Analisis Kenaikan Harga BBM,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v3i2.897.

[15] A. Zalvadila, “Klasifikasi Penyakit Tanaman Bawang Merah Menggunakan Metode SVM dan CNN,” J. Inform. J. Pengemb. IT, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 255–260, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30591/jpit.v8i3.5341.

[16] S. Begum, E. Naresh, and N. N. Srinidhi, “A hybrid deep learning model for robust and efficient plant leaf disease detection using ResNet50, PCA, and SVM,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, art. no. 15805, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46085-w.

[17] A. Usha Ruby, J. George Chellin Chandran, B. N. Chaithanya, et al., “Wheat leaf disease classification using modified ResNet50 convolutional neural network model,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 62875–62893, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-18049-z.

[18] P. K. Sethy, L. Korada, S. K. Behera, A. Shirole, R. Amat, and A. Nanthaamornphong, “Maximizing steel slice defect detection: Integrating ResNet101 deep features with SVM via Bayesian optimization,” Syst. Soft Comput., vol. 6, p. 200170, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2024.200170.

[19] J. Sharma, A. A. Al-Huqail, A. Almogren, H. Doshi, B. Jayaprakash, B. Bharathi, A. Ur Rehman, and S. Hussen, “Deep learning based ensemble model for accurate tomato leaf disease classification by leveraging ResNet50 and MobileNetV2 architectures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 13904, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98015-x.

[20] S. A. Preanto, M. T. Ahad, Y. R. Emon, S. Mustofa, and M. Alamin, “A study on deep feature extraction to detect and classify Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL),”, 2024.

[21] K. Kalita, K. Medhi, S. K. Borah, A. Deka, and S. Baruah, “Multi class tea leaf disease classification using feature level and output level ensemble strategies with Grad-CAM visualization,” Plant Sci. Today, vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11513.

[22] M. Bhagat and D. Kumar, “Kernelized SVM with deep learning features for tea leaf disease prediction,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, no. 13, pp. 39117–39134, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17172-1.

[23] P. Bhuyan, P. K. Singh, and S. K. Das, “Res4net-CBAM: a deep CNN with convolution block attention module for tea leaf disease diagnosis,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 48925–48947, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17472-6.

[24] Q. Heng, S. Yu, and Y. Zhang, “A new AI-based approach for automatic identification of tea leaf disease using deep neural network based on hybrid pooling,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e26465, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26465.

[25] M. J. A. Soeb et al., “Tea leaf disease detection and identification based on YOLOv7,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, p. 6078, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33270-4.

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Comparison of ResNet50 and ResNet101 Feature Extraction for Tea Leaf Disease Classification Using Support Vector Machine. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Data and Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v7i2.338