Comparison of Machine Learning Land Use-Land Cover Supervised Classifiers Performance on Satellite Imagery Sentinel 2 using Lazy Predict Library

Muhamad Iqbal Januadi Putra; Vincent Alexander

doi:10.56705/ijodas.v4i3.102

Muhamad Iqbal Januadi Putra Universitas Terbuka, Universitas Siber Asia
Vincent Alexander Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v4i3.102

Keywords: Classification, Machine Learning, Lazy Predict Library, LULC, Remote Sensing

Abstract

The utilisation of various supervised classifier algorithms in classifying land use and land cover (LULC) from satellite imagery has been widely used worldwide, yet the implementation using lazy predict library remained unexplored. This study aims to create the LULC supervised classifier model for Sentinel 2 satellite images using lazy predict library and assess its capability for creating multiple machine learning models. The result of this study shows that lazy predict library can generate 26 machine learning models in efficient few lines of code and less time-consuming. Most LULC models generated by lazy predicts has performance metrics above 90% with time computation between 0 and 1 seconds. While lazy predict library has benefits to generate various machine learning models at once, it has drawbacks in terms of its feasibility for the machine learning production, its obstacle running in local environment, and its requirements for the RAM computation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Talukdar et al., “Land-Use Land-Cover Classification by Machine Learning Classifiers for Satellite Observations—A Review,” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1135, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/rs12071135.

S. Basheer et al., “Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 19, p. 4978, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14194978.

S. Aldiansyah and R. A. Saputra, “Comparison Of Machine Learning Algorithms For Land Use And Land Cover Analysis Using Google Earth Engine (Case Study: Wanggu Watershed),” Int. J. Remote Sens. Earth Sci., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 197, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.30536/j.ijreses.2022.v19.a3803.

Y. G. Yuh, W. Tracz, H. D. Matthews, and S. E. Turner, “Application of machine learning approaches for land cover monitoring in northern Cameroon,” Ecol. Inform., vol. 74, p. 101955, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101955.

E. Alshdaifat, D. Alshdaifat, A. Alsarhan, F. Hussein, and S. M. F. S. El-Salhi, “The Effect of Preprocessing Techniques, Applied to Numeric Features, on Classification Algorithms’ Performance,” Data, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 11, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/data6020011.

Y. O. Ouma, A. Keitsile, B. Nkwae, P. Odirile, D. Moalafhi, and J. Qi, “Urban land-use classification using machine learning classifiers: comparative evaluation and post-classification multi-feature fusion approach,” Eur. J. Remote Sens., vol. 56, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/22797254.2023.2173659.

A. Jamali, “Land use land cover mapping using advanced machine learning classifiers,” Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 286–300, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.2478/eko-2021-0031.

S. Swetanisha, A. R. Panda, and D. K. Behera, “Land use/land cover classification using machine learning models,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 2040, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i2.pp2040-2046.

A. E. Eldin Rashed, A. M. Elmorsy, and A. E. Mansour Atwa, “Comparative evaluation of automated machine learning techniques for breast cancer diagnosis,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 86, p. 105016, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105016.

K. Nidhul, “Enhanced thermo-hydraulic performance in a V-ribbed triangular duct solar air heater: CFD and exergy analysis,” Energy, vol. 200, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117448.

S. W. Sharshir, “Performance enhancement of stepped double slope solar still by using nanoparticles and linen wicks: Energy, exergy and economic analysis,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 174, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115278.

M. E. Zayed, “Performance prediction and techno-economic analysis of solar dish/stirling system for electricity generation,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 164, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114427.

P. Sharma, “Performance analysis of deep learning CNN models for disease detection in plants using image segmentation,” Inf. Process. Agric., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 566–574, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2019.11.001.

S. Rahman, “Performance analysis of boosting classifiers in recognizing activities of daily living,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031082.

T. K. Nguyen et al., “Machine learning-based screening of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and molecular docking analysis of essential oils from Ocimum basilicum against breast cancer,” J. Mol. Struct., vol. 1268, p. 133627, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133627.

E. Alshdaifat , D. Alshdaifat, A. Alsarhan, F. Hussein and S. M. F. El Salhi, "The Effect of Preprocessing Techniques, Applied to Numeric Features, on Classification Algorithms’ Performance," Data, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6020011.

A. Tharwat, “Classification assessment methods,” Appl. Comput. Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168–192, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003.

D. Kim, “Classification of surface settlement levels induced by TBM driving in urban areas using random forest with data-driven feature selection,” Autom. Constr., vol. 135, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104109.

H. Nhat-Duc, “Comparison of histogram-based gradient boosting classification machine, random Forest, and deep convolutional neural network for pavement raveling severity classification,” Autom. Constr., vol. 148, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104767.

M. Mafarja, “Classification framework for faulty-software using enhanced exploratory whale optimizer-based feature selection scheme and random forest ensemble learning,” Appl. Intell., vol. 53, no. 15, pp. 18715–18757, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-04427-x.

O. S. Djandja, “Random forest-based modeling for insights on phosphorus content in hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge,” Energy, vol. 245, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123295.

M. Salem, “Random Forest modelling and evaluation of the performance of a full-scale subsurface constructed wetland plant in Egypt,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101778.

A. A. Ewees, “Performance analysis of Chaotic Multi-Verse Harris Hawks Optimization: A case study on solving engineering problems,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 88, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103370.

B. Cao, “Performance analysis and comparison of PoW, PoS and DAG based blockchains,” Digit. Commun. Networks, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 480–485, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2019.12.001.

A. Das, “Assessment of peri-urban wetland ecological degradation through importance-performance analysis (IPA): A study on Chatra Wetland, India,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 114, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106274.

D. İzci, “Comparative performance analysis of slime mould algorithm for efficient design of proportional–integral–derivative controller,” Electrica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 2021, doi: 10.5152/ELECTRICA.2021.20077.