Comparison of Machine Learning Land Use-Land Cover Supervised Classifiers Performance on Satellite Imagery Sentinel 2 using Lazy Predict Library

  • Muhamad Iqbal Januadi Putra Universitas Terbuka, Universitas Siber Asia
  • Vincent Alexander Universitas Tarumanagara

Keywords: Classification, Machine Learning, Lazy Predict Library, LULC, Remote Sensing

Abstract

The utilisation of various supervised classifier algorithms in classifying land use and land cover (LULC) from satellite imagery has been widely used worldwide, yet the implementation using lazy predict library remained unexplored. This study aims to create the LULC supervised classifier model for Sentinel 2 satellite images using lazy predict library and assess its capability for creating multiple machine learning models. The result of this study shows that lazy predict library can generate 26 machine learning models in efficient few lines of code and less time-consuming. Most LULC models generated by lazy predicts has performance metrics above 90% with time computation between 0 and 1 seconds. While lazy predict library has benefits to generate various machine learning models at once, it has drawbacks in terms of its feasibility for the machine learning production, its obstacle running in local environment, and its requirements for the RAM computation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Alshdaifat , D. Alshdaifat, A. Alsarhan, F. Hussein and S. M. F. El Salhi, "The Effect of Preprocessing Techniques, Applied to Numeric Features, on Classification Algorithms’ Performance," Data, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6020011

P. Manikandan and D. Ramyachitra, "Naïve Bayes Classification Technique for Analysis of Ecoli Imbalance Dataset," International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98-103, 2014. https://www.periyaruniversity.ac.in/ijcii/issue/Vol4No2September2014/IJCII-4-2-141.pdf

J. Han, M. Kamber and J. Pei, 2012, Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-61819-5

A. Jamali, "Land Use Land Cover Mapping Using Advanced Machine Learning Classifiers," Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 286-300, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2021-0031

A. Mahmood, Y. Sandali and . J.-L. Wang, "Easy and Fast Prediction of Green Solvents for Small Molecule Donor-Based Organis Solar Cells Through Machine Learning," Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 10417-10426, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP00177F

H. J. Escalante, "A Comparison of Outlier Detection Algorithms for Machine Learning," Programming and Computer Software, pp. 228-237, 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228728521

T. K. Nguyen, T. N. L. Nguyen, K. Nguyen, H. V. T. Nguyen, L. T. T. Tran, T. X. T. Ngo, P. T. V. Pham and M. H. Tran, "Machine Learning-Based Screening of MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells and Molecular Docking Analysis of Essential Oils from Ocimum Basilicum Against Breast Cancer," Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1268, no. 133627, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133627

O. Y. Ouma, A. Keitsile, B. Nkwae, P. Odirile, D. Moalafhi and J. Qi, "Urban Land-Use Classification Using Machine Learning Classifiers: Comparative Evaluation and Post-Classification Multi-Feature Fusion Approach," European Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 56, no. 1, p. 2173659, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2173659

A. E. E. Rashed, A. M. Elmorsy and A. E. M. Atwa, "Comparative Evaluation of Automated Machine Learning Techniques for Breast Cancer Diagnosis," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 86, p. 105016, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105016

S. Swetanisha, A. R. Panda and D. K. Behera, "Land Use/Land Cover Classification Using Machine Learning," International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2040-2046, 2022. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i2.pp2040-2046

S. Talukdar, P. Singha, S. Mahato, Shahfahad, S. Pal, Y.-A. Liou and A. Rahman, "Land-Use Land-Cover Classification by Machine Learning Classifiers for Satellite Oberservations—A Review," Remote Sens, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1135, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071135

A. Tharwat, "Classification Assessment Methods," Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168-192, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003

Y. G. Yuh, W. Tracz, H. D. Matthews and S. E. Turner, "Application of Machine Learning Approaches for Land Cover Monitoring in Northern Cameroon," Ecological Informatics, vol. 74, p. 101955, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101955

S. Aldiansyah and R. A. Saputra, "Comparison Of Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Use and Land Cover Analysis Using Google Earth Engine (Case Study: Wanggu Watershed)," International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 197-210, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.ijreses.2022.v19.a3803

S. Basheer, X. Wang, A. A. Farooque, R. A. Nawaz, K. Liu, T. Adekanmbi and S. Liu, "Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using," Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 4978, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978

Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
Muhamad Iqbal Januadi Putra, & Vincent Alexander. (2023). Comparison of Machine Learning Land Use-Land Cover Supervised Classifiers Performance on Satellite Imagery Sentinel 2 using Lazy Predict Library. Indonesian Journal of Data and Science, 4(3), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v4i3.102